Recognizing a toxic workplace might seem challenging, but attentive candidates can often spot an “interview red flag” as a warning sign during the process, writes Morgan Smith for CNBC Make it. 

A recent survey by Monster, which included over 6,000 participants, highlighted a significant concern: 65 percent of job seekers believe that undergoing more than three interview rounds is a major red flag, potentially indicating an unhealthy work environment. 

Such extended interview procedures might suggest that a company is either indecisive or disorganized.

Vicki Salemi, Monster’s career expert, shared with CNBC that while there can occasionally be valid reasons for a longer hiring process, such as scheduling challenges, a protracted process often reveals a company’s disregard for a candidate’s time or its own uncertainty about hiring requirements. 

However, it’s essential to understand that the landscape of job interviews is evolving. Recent data indicates that job interviews are becoming increasingly lengthy across all sectors. 

Entry-level roles now have an average hiring cycle of about six weeks, while senior positions can take up to seven weeks. 

This shift can be attributed to the current competitive labor market and the surge in remote work opportunities. Companies, now having access to a broader talent pool, are becoming more meticulous in their candidate evaluations. 

Salemi advises candidates to be proactive during the hiring process. By inquiring about the hiring timeline and understanding the reasons behind a position’s availability, candidates can better assess potential workplace dynamics.  

Such transparency can offer insights into whether a role is worth waiting for or if exploring other opportunities might be more beneficial. 

For a more in-depth analysis and additional perspectives on the job interview landscape, visit CNBC. 

Five red flags in a job interview- signs of a bad employer.